{"id":47671,"date":"2019-06-19T10:03:55","date_gmt":"2019-06-19T15:03:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/2019\/06\/19\/the-bounds-of-political-debate-and-criticism\/"},"modified":"2025-10-03T14:10:58","modified_gmt":"2025-10-03T18:10:58","slug":"the-bounds-of-political-debate-and-criticism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2019\/06\/19\/the-bounds-of-political-debate-and-criticism\/","title":{"rendered":"2. The bounds of political debate and criticism"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The public draws distinctions when it comes to the types of speech and behavior they deem acceptable from elected officials. Wide majorities of Americans say it is acceptable for elected officials to call their opponent uninformed on the issues and to raise their voice in a debate, but there is much lower tolerance for officials personally mocking their opponents or deliberately mischaracterizing their record.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\"What\u2019s<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Roughly three-quarters of Americans say it is at least sometimes acceptable to say their opponent\u2019s policy positions are incorrect (73%) or that their opponent is uninformed on the issues (74%). A narrow majority (58%) says it is at least sometimes acceptable for elected officials to raise their voice in a debate. Few see these behaviors as never<\/em> acceptable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

But there are behaviors that overwhelming majorities say have no place in political discourse. About eight-in-ten (81%) say it is never acceptable to deliberately mislead people about an opponent\u2019s record or to say something negative about the physical appearance of an opponent\u2019s spouse (81%), while 73% say it is never acceptable to criticize their opponent\u2019s appearance \u2013 and nine-in-ten or more consider these behaviors at most rarely <\/em>acceptable.<\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

The public also generally views calling one\u2019s political opponent \u201cstupid\u201d as out of bounds: 62% say this is never acceptable, while an additional 22% say it is rarely acceptable. And about half of the public says it is never acceptable for an official to shout over their opponent in a debate (49%) or to ridicule an opponent (50%), with three-quarters or more saying these behaviors are no more than rarely acceptable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

However, public opinion is more mixed over the acceptability of calling an opponent\u2019s policy positions \u201cevil\u201d \u2013 while 35% say this is never acceptable and 34% say it is rarely acceptable, 31% say it is at least sometimes acceptable. Similarly, while 41% believe that it is never acceptable for an elected official to say their opponent is \u201canti-American,\u201d 31% say this is rarely acceptable and 27% say this is at least sometimes acceptable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Partisans differ over acceptability of some types of political criticism<\/h3>\n\n\n\n
\"Wide<\/a><\/figure>\n\n\n\n

Democrats are more likely than Republicans to view a range of behaviors as out of bounds. And some of the largest partisan gaps are over whether it is acceptable for elected officials to call into question the patriotism of their political opponents.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

About three-quarters of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents (76%) say it is rarely or never acceptable for an elected official to say \u201cthey love America more than their opponent does,\u201d including half who say this is never acceptable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

By comparison, 45% of Republicans and Republican leaners say it is rarely or never acceptable for an official to say they love America more than their opponent \u2013 including just 21% who consider this completely out of bounds in politics. The pattern of opinion about whether it is acceptable to call one\u2019s opponent anti-American is nearly identical.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

There also are substantial partisan gaps in other areas, including the acceptability of ridiculing one\u2019s opponent (59% of Democrats say this is never acceptable vs. 40% of Republicans), calling them stupid (70% vs. 51%) or saying their policy positions are evil (42% vs. 26%). But Democrats and Republicans are in general agreement that deliberately misleading people about their opponent\u2019s record is out of bounds (82% of Democrats and 80% of Republicans say this is never acceptable), as is criticism of a spouse\u2019s appearance (84% of Democrats, 78% of Republicans say it\u2019s never acceptable).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

<\/a>Insults are seen as more acceptable when your party is the instigator<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Partisans also have different views of how acceptable these types of political insults are, depending on the partisanship of the political officials involved. For example, in the case of how acceptable it is to call an opponent\u2019s policy positions evil:<\/p>\n\n\n

<\/div>\n\n\n
\"Partisans<\/a><\/figure>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The public draws distinctions when it comes to the types of speech and behavior they deem acceptable from elected officials. Wide majorities of Americans say it is acceptable for elected officials to call their opponent uninformed on the issues and to raise their voice in a debate, but there is much lower tolerance for officials […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":457,"featured_media":60759,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sub_headline":"","sub_title":"","_prc_public_revisions":[],"_ppp_expiration_hours":0,"_ppp_enabled":false,"ai_generated_summary":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"relatedPosts":[],"reportMaterials":[],"multiSectionReport":[],"package_parts__enabled":false,"package_parts":[],"datacite_doi":"","datacite_doi_citation":"","_prc_seo_qr_attachment_id":0,"spoken_article_player_enabled":true,"displayBylines":true,"footnotes":"","prc_watchers":[],"_prc_fork_parent":0,"_prc_fork_status":"","_prc_active_fork":0,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[],"tags":[],"bylines":[],"collection":[],"datasets":[],"level_of_effort":[],"primary_audience":[],"information_type":[],"_post_visibility":[],"formats":[458],"_fund_pool":[],"languages":[],"regions-countries":[],"research-teams":[520],"workflow-status":[],"class_list":["post-47671","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","formats-report","research-teams-politics"],"label":false,"post_parent":47691,"word_count":605,"canonical_url":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2019\/06\/19\/the-bounds-of-political-debate-and-criticism\/","art_direction":{"A1":{"id":60603,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2019\/06\/PP_19.05.29_PoliticalDiscourse_crop.png","url":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2019\/06\/PP_19.05.29_PoliticalDiscourse_crop.png?w=536&h=302&crop=1","width":536,"height":302,"chartArt":false},"A2":{"id":60603,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2019\/06\/PP_19.05.29_PoliticalDiscourse_crop.png","url":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2019\/06\/PP_19.05.29_PoliticalDiscourse_crop.png?w=268&h=151&crop=1","width":268,"height":151,"chartArt":false},"A3":{"id":60603,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2019\/06\/PP_19.05.29_PoliticalDiscourse_crop.png","url":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2019\/06\/PP_19.05.29_PoliticalDiscourse_crop.png?w=194&h=110&crop=1","width":194,"height":110,"chartArt":true},"A4":{"id":60603,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2019\/06\/PP_19.05.29_PoliticalDiscourse_crop.png","url":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2019\/06\/PP_19.05.29_PoliticalDiscourse_crop.png?w=268&h=151&crop=1","width":268,"height":151,"chartArt":true},"XL":{"id":60603,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2019\/06\/PP_19.05.29_PoliticalDiscourse_crop.png","url":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2019\/06\/PP_19.05.29_PoliticalDiscourse_crop.png?w=536&h=302&crop=1","width":536,"height":302,"chartArt":false},"social":{"id":60603,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2019\/06\/PP_19.05.29_PoliticalDiscourse_crop.png","url":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2019\/06\/PP_19.05.29_PoliticalDiscourse_crop.png?w=536&h=302&crop=1","width":536,"height":302,"chartArt":false}},"_embeds":[],"watchers":[],"table_of_contents":[{"id":47691,"title":"Public Highly Critical of State of Political Discourse in the U.S.","slug":"public-highly-critical-of-state-of-political-discourse-in-the-u-s","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2019\/06\/19\/public-highly-critical-of-state-of-political-discourse-in-the-u-s\/","is_active":false},{"id":47681,"title":"1. The climate for discourse around the country, on campus and on social media","slug":"the-climate-for-discourse-around-the-country-on-campus-and-on-social-media","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2019\/06\/19\/the-climate-for-discourse-around-the-country-on-campus-and-on-social-media\/","is_active":false},{"id":47671,"title":"2. The bounds of political debate and criticism","slug":"the-bounds-of-political-debate-and-criticism","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2019\/06\/19\/the-bounds-of-political-debate-and-criticism\/","is_active":true},{"id":47662,"title":"3. Trump\u2019s impact on the tone of political debate, important characteristics for elected officials","slug":"trumps-impact-on-the-tone-of-political-debate-important-characteristics-for-elected-officials","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2019\/06\/19\/trumps-impact-on-the-tone-of-political-debate-important-characteristics-for-elected-officials\/","is_active":false},{"id":47654,"title":"4. The public\u2019s level of comfort talking politics and Trump","slug":"the-publics-level-of-comfort-talking-politics-and-trump","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2019\/06\/19\/the-publics-level-of-comfort-talking-politics-and-trump\/","is_active":false},{"id":47641,"title":"5. The personal side of speech and expression","slug":"the-personal-side-of-speech-and-expression","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2019\/06\/19\/the-personal-side-of-speech-and-expression\/","is_active":false},{"id":47626,"title":"6. The challenge of knowing what\u2019s offensive","slug":"the-challenge-of-knowing-whats-offensive","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2019\/06\/19\/the-challenge-of-knowing-whats-offensive\/","is_active":false},{"id":47616,"title":"Methodology","slug":"political-discourse-methodology","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2019\/06\/19\/political-discourse-methodology\/","is_active":false},{"id":47606,"title":"Appendix: Measures and scales","slug":"political-discourse-appendix-measures-and-scales","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2019\/06\/19\/political-discourse-appendix-measures-and-scales\/","is_active":false}],"report_materials":[{"key":"fe230a9b-6123-4d74-b0d1-e6a413206f4e","type":"report","url":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2019\/06\/PP_2019.06.19_Political-Discourse_FINAL.pdf","label":"","icon":"","attachmentId":""},{"key":"55608f1c-ca51-4eac-a594-44452e3fc394","type":"topline","url":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2019\/06\/PP_2019.06.19_Political-Discourse_TOPLINE.pdf","label":"","icon":"","attachmentId":""},{"key":"b3cddaa5-c21b-4416-b3ee-b36eb9238a87","type":"promo","url":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2019\/06\/PP_2019.06.19_discourse_2-03promo.png","label":"Views about the acceptability of political insults","icon":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2019\/06\/PP_2019.06.19_discourse_2-03promo.png?w=75&h=75&crop=1","attachmentId":60582},{"key":"f560378f-8764-4c72-9e4a-c576c0b28f04","type":"promo","url":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2019\/06\/Screen-Shot-2019-11-01-at-5.56.40-PM.png","label":"Across the Table: Would you share your views of Trump over dinner?","icon":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/4\/2019\/06\/Screen-Shot-2019-11-01-at-5.56.40-PM.png?w=75&h=75&crop=1","attachmentId":60599},{"type":"dataset","id":1139,"label":"American Trends Panel Wave 48","url":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/dataset\/american-trends-panel-wave-48\/"}],"report_pagination":{"current_post":{"id":47671,"title":"2. The bounds of political debate and criticism","slug":"the-bounds-of-political-debate-and-criticism","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2019\/06\/19\/the-bounds-of-political-debate-and-criticism\/","is_active":true,"page_num":3},"next_post":{"id":47662,"title":"3. Trump\u2019s impact on the tone of political debate, important characteristics for elected officials","slug":"trumps-impact-on-the-tone-of-political-debate-important-characteristics-for-elected-officials","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2019\/06\/19\/trumps-impact-on-the-tone-of-political-debate-important-characteristics-for-elected-officials\/","is_active":false,"page_num":4},"previous_post":{"id":47681,"title":"1. The climate for discourse around the country, on campus and on social media","slug":"the-climate-for-discourse-around-the-country-on-campus-and-on-social-media","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2019\/06\/19\/the-climate-for-discourse-around-the-country-on-campus-and-on-social-media\/","is_active":false,"page_num":2},"pagination_items":[{"id":47691,"title":"Public Highly Critical of State of Political Discourse in the U.S.","slug":"public-highly-critical-of-state-of-political-discourse-in-the-u-s","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2019\/06\/19\/public-highly-critical-of-state-of-political-discourse-in-the-u-s\/","is_active":false,"page_num":1},{"id":47681,"title":"1. The climate for discourse around the country, on campus and on social media","slug":"the-climate-for-discourse-around-the-country-on-campus-and-on-social-media","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2019\/06\/19\/the-climate-for-discourse-around-the-country-on-campus-and-on-social-media\/","is_active":false,"page_num":2},{"id":47671,"title":"2. The bounds of political debate and criticism","slug":"the-bounds-of-political-debate-and-criticism","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2019\/06\/19\/the-bounds-of-political-debate-and-criticism\/","is_active":true,"page_num":3},{"id":47662,"title":"3. Trump\u2019s impact on the tone of political debate, important characteristics for elected officials","slug":"trumps-impact-on-the-tone-of-political-debate-important-characteristics-for-elected-officials","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2019\/06\/19\/trumps-impact-on-the-tone-of-political-debate-important-characteristics-for-elected-officials\/","is_active":false,"page_num":4},{"id":47654,"title":"4. The public\u2019s level of comfort talking politics and Trump","slug":"the-publics-level-of-comfort-talking-politics-and-trump","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2019\/06\/19\/the-publics-level-of-comfort-talking-politics-and-trump\/","is_active":false,"page_num":5},{"id":47641,"title":"5. The personal side of speech and expression","slug":"the-personal-side-of-speech-and-expression","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2019\/06\/19\/the-personal-side-of-speech-and-expression\/","is_active":false,"page_num":6},{"id":47626,"title":"6. The challenge of knowing what\u2019s offensive","slug":"the-challenge-of-knowing-whats-offensive","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2019\/06\/19\/the-challenge-of-knowing-whats-offensive\/","is_active":false,"page_num":7},{"id":47616,"title":"Methodology","slug":"political-discourse-methodology","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2019\/06\/19\/political-discourse-methodology\/","is_active":false,"page_num":8},{"id":47606,"title":"Appendix: Measures and scales","slug":"political-discourse-appendix-measures-and-scales","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/politics\/2019\/06\/19\/political-discourse-appendix-measures-and-scales\/","is_active":false,"page_num":9}]},"parent_info":{"parent_title":"Public Highly Critical of State of Political Discourse in the U.S.","parent_id":47691},"materialsOrdered":[],"chaptersOrdered":[],"partsOrdered":[],"partsEnabled":false,"datacite_doi":"","prc_seo_data":{"title":"2. The bounds of political debate and criticism","description":"The public draws distinctions when it comes to the types of speech and behavior they deem acceptable from elected officials. Wide majorities of Americans say it is acceptable for elected…","og_title":"2. The bounds of political debate and criticism","og_description":"","schema_type":"Article","noindex":false,"canonical_url":"","primary_terms":[],"custom_schema":[],"og_image":60603,"indexnow_submitted_at":null,"gsc_index_status":null},"prepublish_checks":{"prc-image-alt-text":{"status":"complete","message":"All images have alt text.","data":null},"prc-about-this-research":{"status":"incomplete","message":"Add an \"About this research\" details block.","data":null},"prc-paragraph-count":{"status":"complete","message":"Found 10 paragraphs.","data":{"count":10}},"prc-internal-link":{"status":"complete","message":"Found 3 internal links.","data":{"count":3}}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2019\/06\/PP_2019.06.19_discourse_featured.png","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"relatedPostsOrdered":[],"bylinesOrdered":[],"acknowledgementsOrdered":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47671","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/457"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47671"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47671\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":296446,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47671\/revisions\/296446"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/60759"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47671"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47671"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47671"},{"taxonomy":"bylines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/bylines?post=47671"},{"taxonomy":"collection","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/collection?post=47671"},{"taxonomy":"datasets","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/datasets?post=47671"},{"taxonomy":"level_of_effort","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/level_of_effort?post=47671"},{"taxonomy":"primary_audience","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/primary_audience?post=47671"},{"taxonomy":"information_type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/information_type?post=47671"},{"taxonomy":"_post_visibility","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/_post_visibility?post=47671"},{"taxonomy":"formats","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/formats?post=47671"},{"taxonomy":"_fund_pool","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/_fund_pool?post=47671"},{"taxonomy":"languages","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/languages?post=47671"},{"taxonomy":"regions-countries","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/regions-countries?post=47671"},{"taxonomy":"research-teams","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/research-teams?post=47671"},{"taxonomy":"workflow-status","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/workflow-status?post=47671"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}