{"id":93537,"date":"2017-06-06T09:50:54","date_gmt":"2017-06-06T14:50:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/2017\/06\/06\/theme-7-whether-or-not-people-disconnect-the-dangers-are-real-security-and-civil-liberties-issues-are-being-magnified-by-the-rapid-rise-of-the-internet-of-things\/"},"modified":"2024-04-14T04:17:05","modified_gmt":"2024-04-14T09:17:05","slug":"theme-7-whether-or-not-people-disconnect-the-dangers-are-real-security-and-civil-liberties-issues-are-being-magnified-by-the-rapid-rise-of-the-internet-of-things","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/theme-7-whether-or-not-people-disconnect-the-dangers-are-real-security-and-civil-liberties-issues-are-being-magnified-by-the-rapid-rise-of-the-internet-of-things\/","title":{"rendered":"Theme 7: Whether or not people disconnect, the dangers are real. Security and civil liberties issues are being magnified by the rapid rise of the Internet of Things"},"content":{"rendered":"

Many respondents to this canvassing said they are certain that there will be more attacks with more devastating results as billions more things and people become interconnected online and systems become more complex and difficult to manage. Some say these security concerns are likely to lead to regulation, although it might not take place until after a devastating attack or exploit. Even if an extreme \u201cthreat environment\u201d does not emerge, some respondents believe that the protection of individual rights \u2013 of civil liberties \u2013 is greatly endangered by the Internet of Things, a world in which enormous quantities of granular data can be continuously collected, databased and analyzed, then used to form judgments about people, and to try to sell them things and ideas, and possibly even to manipulate them.<\/p>\n\n

Threats are likely to turn into attacks and other acts, possibly some violent<\/h4>\n\n

Nigel Cameron<\/strong>, president and CEO of the Center for Policy on Emerging Technologies, observed, \u201cThe sky\u2019s the limit; if you can hack a Jeep<\/a> from a basement QWERTY keyboard you can take control of a nuclear power station or an aircraft or have a million cars turn left on cue. In principle.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

Hackers will hack. Criminals will plunder. We\u2019ll lurch from crisis to crisis. It\u2019s not clear whether it\u2019s possible to make things more secure, or to limit damage. We may be facing a continuing arms race.\nMiles Fidelman<\/cite><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n

An anonymous chief scientist<\/strong> wrote, \u201cHackable systems (that is all<\/em> of them!) will be the basis of Chernobyl-type events in the connected world.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

Marc Brenman<\/strong>, managing partner at IDARE LLC, replied, \u201cFailures will continue to occur, and grow worse. Cascading failures will occur. Cybersecurity will continue to be breached. Safety is illusory.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

[electromagnetic pulse<\/a>]<\/p>\n\n\n

Miles Fidelman<\/strong>, systems architect and policy analyst at Protocol Technologies Group and president at the Center for Civic Networking, commented, \u201cHackers will hack. Criminals will plunder. We\u2019ll lurch from crisis to crisis. It\u2019s not clear whether it\u2019s possible to make things more secure, or to limit damage. We may be facing a continuing arms race.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

Thomas Claburn<\/strong>, editor at large at InformationWeek, replied, \u201cJudging by the state of computer security today, there\u2019s no reason to assume things will magically get better by adding more devices, particularly those that govern daily interactions like cars, alarm systems and medical devices. Imagine the harm that could be done by remotely turning on the engine of a car in a garage at night, flooding a home with carbon monoxide while the occupants sleep.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

An anonymous systems engineer working for the U.S. government<\/strong> predicted, \u201cFor significant systems \u2013 public infrastructure, health and safety \u2013 the risk may be high enough to prevent widespread adoption.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

An anonymous senior design researcher<\/strong> commented, \u201cI worry about monopolies with code that is vastly distributed and controlling home systems failing, causing entire regions to become unstable due to a line of code.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

An anonymous professor at a state university<\/strong> commented, \u201cIt\u2019s actually surprising that we haven\u2019t already seen major disasters caused by hacking, of the sort that would close down cities or states.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

An anonymous senior software engineer at Microsoft <\/strong>wrote, \u201cIoT security will be poor and it will become a target for cyberwarfare.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

Charles Perkins<\/strong>, senior principal engineer at Futurewei, wrote, \u201cLoss of freedom is a very significant threat. It is possible to maintain safety but it requires big investment in product development, as well as a realistic vision for the customers.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

An anonymous<\/strong> respondent<\/strong> wrote, \u201cThe risk of totalitarianism will increase, as the power to control other people\u2019s lives goes up and is accessible to corporations and governments.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

[hacks and attacks via networked devices]<\/p>\n\n\n

An anonymous respondent<\/strong> commented, \u201cThe most-serious vulnerabilities involve the most-capable players. They can use stealth or blitzkrieg tactics on systems like infrastructure that no one can escape. The technology of an independent lifeboat does not exist on Earth.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

Tom Ryan<\/strong>, CEO of eLearn Institute Inc., replied, \u201cThe Internet of Things continues to grow, especially as new ways to connect machine to machine to automate provide more convenience. There is also a corresponding growth in industrial and governmental cybersecurity and international cybercombat that are driving threats and responses. There will most likely be a major event that will occur due to the opportunities that the Internet of Things provides to people that choose to do harm. My biggest concern is something that cripples countries\u2019 infrastructure (electrical, communications, water, energy).\u201d<\/p>\n\n

Pete Cranston<\/strong> of EuforicServices.com commented, \u201cThere will be scares, genuine disasters, but the potential gains from interconnectivity are so great that we will continue to lurch into a future where we will have to confront issues of independent machine-machine decision-making much more actively. (This is also known as machine intelligence, but actually has more to do with interlocking algorithms exponentially increasing the complexity of machine response patterns.)\u201d<\/p>\n\n

Susan Mernit<\/strong>, CEO and co-founder at Hack the Hood, observed, \u201cFor many, these will be viewed as creature comforts and conveniences \u2013 until they don\u2019t work as planned. The Big Brother aspects of the Internet of Things really scare me. I don\u2019t want my self-driving car to control where I go.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

An anonymous CEO<\/strong> commented, \u201cI don\u2019t think it\u2019s possible to network objects together to ensure they remain safe \u2013 a hacker is always one step ahead.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

[incorrect]<\/p>\n\n\n

The rise of the IoT and security concerns amplifies worries over civil liberties<\/h4>\n\n

Threaded throughout many respondents\u2019 answers were concerns about the rights of the individual. They said the threat level for civil liberties is on the rise as more of the world and the objects therein become networked, intelligence-gathering nodes in the Internet of Things.<\/p>\n\n

The government has been the most prolific user of people\u2019s private information, phone calls, etc. While this is done in the name of safety, it nonetheless diminishes everyone\u2019s privacy. I do not see things improving.\nAnonymous chief legal officer<\/cite><\/p><\/blockquote>\n\n

Masha Falkov<\/strong>, artist and glassblower, observed, \u201cEncryption is key to protecting devices and the information they hold within, especially as everything becomes more interconnected. Yet governments and marketers alike wish to weaken privacy and encryption in favor of greater surveillance capability. This puts everyone in danger. Devices on whose consistent operation lives depend can be tampered with, sometimes by individuals whose sole purpose is just to see if they could, as well as terrorists and other people of malicious intent. I don\u2019t believe it is possible to have 100% security because our operating systems are always evolving as we search for greater potential to our tech. But it is possible to improve security through several means. One is to require high security standards and encryption on all connectivity devices, and to make companies that create these devices and software liable for damages that may result. This will ensure to some degree that companies do not skimp on their security teams. Another means, which is happening right now, is to enlist hackers into helping companies and developers into finding security flaws through the use of cash prizes or employment. This also creates an outlet for people who love to hack to be productive individuals rather than a nuisance. Finally, make sure that the laws are set up so that hackers who find flaws but do not exploit them can report them without fear of prosecution.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

An anonymous chief legal officer<\/strong> replied, \u201cThe government has been the most prolific user of people\u2019s private information, phone calls, etc. While this is done in the name of safety, it nonetheless diminishes everyone\u2019s privacy. I do not see things improving.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

An anonymous sociologist at the Social Media Research Foundation<\/strong> wrote, \u201cThe need for security in IoT devices will lead toward oligopoly \u2013 only a few leading businesses will be able to provide a sufficient level of security. This will mean that the IoT world is one that leads toward monopoly.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

An anonymous<\/strong> respondent commented, \u201cThe drive toward a more highly connected world is being motivated by corporate profits. Highly automated and connected devices allow these companies to maximize profits. However, the everyday person has little to no say in how certain types of networked devices (e.g., water meter) are deployed in their lives. The biggest threat currently is the loss of personal information. However, the future threats will be loss of life due to companies taking shortcuts in how they connect all these devices. While technologists can create protocols and network services that can help minimize threats, it will fall on governments to regulate how certain types of network connections (e.g., medical devices, power grid) are deployed\/maintained.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

Sam Punnett<\/strong>, research officer at TableRock Media, commented, \u201cWe are raising generations of people for whom the connected life is the norm. Increasing connectivity via IoT further complicates the environment and raises the potential for criminality and abuse. \u2026 I am not a network specialist but I have an appreciation for the world of IoT. If given the choice between a vision of the future made secure and safe I would be far more likely to ascribe to one put forward by the Electronic Frontier Foundation<\/a> over one from any element of state surveillance and security.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

Wendy M. Grossman<\/strong>, an independent writing and editing professional based in London, said, \u201cGoing forward, many will not have a choice about it. \u2026 If you can only have one device and one communications network, that\u2019s going to be a smartphone and a data plan, and if you can save money by consenting to let your refrigerator send the supermarket statistics on how and when you consume the groceries you buy, then you will. The problem is especially acute with respect to the technology underlying smart cities, because local authorities make operational decisions that don\u2019t require public consultations that have later impact on civil liberties and human rights. A great example is the auto-dimming streetlights being installed in a number of cities. Local residents, if asked, certainly support the goal of reducing energy use and cost; but they aren\u2019t consulted about the video and audio surveillance systems that form part of these systems. So: both of the statements we began with are true.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

Axel Bruns<\/strong>, professor in the Digital Media Research Centre at Queensland University of Technology, wrote, \u201cAs with other trust issues, users may have significant concerns about data security in engaging with such networked objects \u2013 but in some cases their opportunities for opting out by choosing a non-networked device are likely to diminish rapidly. It is increasingly difficult to find new cars that do not feature back-to-base position tracking and networking as a default, for instance \u2013 so, as older models are disappearing from the marketplace, users will be forced to accept the embedding of such surveillance technologies into their cars (or find ways to hack them, potentially voiding the warranty).\u201d<\/p>\n\n

What do internet companies do with the data they collect? They do business with it. Of course. Nearly all internet systems, devices and services are created to generate a profit. A number of the participants in this canvassing pointed out that algorithms written to individualize people\u2019s experiences are narrowing choices for them in ways that are not to their advantage, not in the name of their personal convenience but in the name of generating corporate profits.<\/p>\n\n

An anonymous respondent<\/strong> said, \u201cI fear that data collected for marketing purposes will further narrow the range of products available to people, removing choice from the market and limiting options.\u201d Another anonymous respondent<\/strong> observed, \u201cPerhaps that is the largest danger \u2013 networking is welcomed in as a convenience, but it actually proves to be a choice-killer.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

An anonymous respondent<\/strong> observed, \u201cThere\u2019s an open question that\u2019s not quite about damage, safety or trust, but it will be fundamental. It\u2019s about how people think about and interact with these agents that collect and often act on information.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

[IoT systems and devices]<\/p>\n\n\n

Another anonymous respondent<\/strong> warned, \u201cIndependence and privacy concerns will result in a fissure in society.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

An anonymous respondent<\/strong> urged, \u201cThere should be more ways to ensure that companies who make devices are ethically and civilly responsible to protect our data and that we can delete\/erase\/decide who gets it at every step. We don\u2019t have that yet.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

An anonymous<\/strong> digital manager<\/strong> commented, \u201cPrivacy settings will be expanded if there are numbers indicating that people are disconnecting completely. Disconnecting in protest might be necessary in mass numbers to actually make this happen \u2013 it should be seen as a form of protest.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

D. Yvette Wohn<\/strong>, assistant professor at the New Jersey Institute of Technology, predicts that those with low socioeconomic status will have fewer options as the Internet of Things evolves. \u201cThe trend toward greater connectivity will take place among a majority of people (90%), but people who have very high income, are public figures or celebrities, or have very high adversity to technology will disconnect. The issue will not be about how we can make technology safer, but what is being done with the data that is collected. The government will come up with guidelines so that there will be different tiers of data that companies can use, based on the users\u2019 preferences. People who are willing to have companies utilize their data more will receive stipends, creating a social imbalance where lower-income people will be more vulnerable to privacy relinquishment.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

Several other respondents said they expect that only the wealthiest people will find ways to disconnect and\/or route around impositions on their civil liberties.<\/p>\n\n

An anonymous project manager<\/strong> replied, \u201cConnectivity will increase, and those able to pay more will be at the forefront of disconnecting or building isolated systems.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

An anonymous IT director<\/strong> wrote, \u201cIf people can afford to, they will disconnect and reduce the amount of digital \u2018distraction\u2019 or engagement in their lives. Paradoxically, it will be the most affluent who will be able to afford this \u2018luxury.\u2019\u201d<\/p>\n\n

Katharina Anna Zweig<\/strong>, a professor at Kaiserslautern University of Technology in Germany, commented, \u201cAs the connectivity promises more comfort, more safety, more savings, more almost anything (next to less privacy), most people will get more and more connected \u2026 I do not believe that there will be a larger group of people totally disconnecting from the internet. It might become a privilege of the very rich, but they can only afford it because the people surrounding them and in their service are connected.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

Luis Lach<\/strong>, president of the Sociedad Mexicana de Computaci\u00f3n en la Educaci\u00f3n, wrote, \u201cPeople who decide to disconnect will be the ones with more information, but this will be an elite group of critical people. The market will win, no matter the consequences to our personal security and protection of personal data, and people will be connected. The more-concerning threat for the technological paradigm (positive or negative) is the evolution of global and local economies. Today, in the year 2016, \u2026 globalization is more of a risk to our lives than a social win. Fewer people are becoming richer in a stupid way, and a vast majority of the population is becoming poorer. We can see a map of world\u2019s migration, just to note that people from underdeveloped countries are migrating to the richest places (Europe and USA), and that is not because those geographies are lands of opportunity, it is because the countries they are coming from are being devastated.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

An anonymous<\/strong> respondent<\/strong> replied, \u201cWe\u2019ll wind up being spied on not just by companies and governments, but third-rate hackers. Any individual who draws the anger of the online mob can look forward to having their basic life hacked. Ordinary devices have no business being connected to the internet. There will be a smaller but healthy market for security-conscious devices with limited connectivity. This might mean that only the wealthy and\/or sophisticated have access to secure or unconnected options.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

Dudley Irish<\/strong>, a software engineer, wrote, \u201cThis is a very complicated issue \u2026 but what I suspect will happen is that people will make changes that should lead to them being more disconnected, but in reality, they will be increasingly connected. I am a very knowledgeable technologist and I<\/em> can\u2019t keep track of all the ways that my behavior is tracked. I consciously avoid being tracked and suspect that I am tracked much more than I would like. Meanwhile, most of the people I know can\u2019t be bothered to limit how much they are tracked because it just takes too much effort. And, it seems like every time I turn around I am reading about yet another privacy failure or technique for de-anonymizing data. This is a context in which regulation could help but is it very unlikely that any useful regulation will be done.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

[s]<\/p>\n\n\n

An anonymous learning systems and analytics lead<\/strong> wrote, \u201cPeople will remain very skeptical but be left with fewer and fewer choices. Companies like Silent Circle cater to those who desire extreme measures around privacy, but it\u2019s definitely a premium. This will continue to be the case. For example, it\u2019s already economically silly to not accept the installation of driving-habit-tracking sensors. The iron cage of connected life will drive people to be more connected whether they want to or not \u2013 and many will not, or will at least have strong reservations.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

[tech users]<\/p>\n\n\n

An anonymous software architect<\/strong> commented, \u201cThe surveillance state will only grow as the profit motive or \u2018national security\u2019 interests dictate. Most people will be unemployed and not be able to afford such conveniences or see them as time savers when they have too much time on their hands already (no jobs). This can come to no good end.\u201d<\/p>\n\n

Dan Caprio<\/strong>, co-founder of The Providence Group, commented, \u201cWe need to work together to protect privacy and security and enable innovation.\u201d<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Many respondents to this canvassing said they are certain that there will be more attacks with more devastating results as billions more things and people become interconnected online and systems become more complex and difficult to manage. Some say these security concerns are likely to lead to regulation, although it might not take place until […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":117,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"sub_headline":"","sub_title":"","_prc_public_revisions":[],"_ppp_expiration_hours":0,"_ppp_enabled":false,"ai_generated_summary":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"relatedPosts":[],"reportMaterials":[],"multiSectionReport":[],"package_parts__enabled":false,"package_parts":[],"datacite_doi":"","datacite_doi_citation":"","_prc_seo_qr_attachment_id":0,"spoken_article_player_enabled":true,"displayBylines":true,"footnotes":"","prc_watchers":[],"_prc_fork_parent":0,"_prc_fork_status":"","_prc_active_fork":0,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[],"tags":[],"bylines":[840,913],"collection":[],"datasets":[],"level_of_effort":[],"primary_audience":[],"information_type":[],"_post_visibility":[],"formats":[458],"_fund_pool":[],"languages":[],"regions-countries":[],"research-teams":[526],"workflow-status":[],"class_list":["post-93537","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","bylines-janna-anderson","bylines-lee-rainie","formats-report","research-teams-internet"],"label":false,"post_parent":93494,"word_count":2951,"canonical_url":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/theme-7-whether-or-not-people-disconnect-the-dangers-are-real-security-and-civil-liberties-issues-are-being-magnified-by-the-rapid-rise-of-the-internet-of-things\/","art_direction":{"A1":{"id":116459,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2017\/06\/PI_2017.06.06_Future-of-Connectivity_featured.png","url":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2017\/06\/PI_2017.06.06_Future-of-Connectivity_featured.png?w=564&h=317&crop=1","width":564,"height":317,"chartArt":false},"A2":{"id":116459,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2017\/06\/PI_2017.06.06_Future-of-Connectivity_featured.png","url":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2017\/06\/PI_2017.06.06_Future-of-Connectivity_featured.png?w=268&h=151&crop=1","width":268,"height":151,"chartArt":false},"A3":{"id":116459,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2017\/06\/PI_2017.06.06_Future-of-Connectivity_featured.png","url":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2017\/06\/PI_2017.06.06_Future-of-Connectivity_featured.png?w=194&h=110&crop=1","width":194,"height":110,"chartArt":false},"A4":{"id":116459,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2017\/06\/PI_2017.06.06_Future-of-Connectivity_featured.png","url":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2017\/06\/PI_2017.06.06_Future-of-Connectivity_featured.png?w=268&h=151&crop=1","width":268,"height":151,"chartArt":false},"XL":{"id":116459,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2017\/06\/PI_2017.06.06_Future-of-Connectivity_featured.png","url":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2017\/06\/PI_2017.06.06_Future-of-Connectivity_featured.png?w=640&h=321&crop=1","width":640,"height":321,"chartArt":false},"social":{"id":116459,"rawUrl":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2017\/06\/PI_2017.06.06_Future-of-Connectivity_featured.png","url":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/20\/2017\/06\/PI_2017.06.06_Future-of-Connectivity_featured.png?w=640&h=321&crop=1","width":640,"height":321,"chartArt":false}},"_embeds":[],"watchers":[],"table_of_contents":[{"id":93494,"title":"The Internet of Things Connectivity Binge: What Are the Implications?","slug":"the-internet-of-things-connectivity-binge-what-are-the-implications","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/the-internet-of-things-connectivity-binge-what-are-the-implications\/","is_active":false},{"id":93523,"title":"About this canvassing of experts","slug":"future-of-connectivity-about-this-canvassing-of-experts","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/future-of-connectivity-about-this-canvassing-of-experts\/","is_active":false},{"id":93564,"title":"Theme 1: People crave connection and convenience, and a tech-linked world serves both goals well","slug":"theme-1-people-crave-connection-and-convenience-and-a-tech-linked-world-serves-both-goals-well","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/theme-1-people-crave-connection-and-convenience-and-a-tech-linked-world-serves-both-goals-well\/","is_active":false},{"id":93555,"title":"Theme 2: Unplugging isn\u2019t easy now, and by 2026 it will be even tougher","slug":"theme-2-unplugging-isnt-easy-now-and-by-2026-it-will-be-even-tougher","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/theme-2-unplugging-isnt-easy-now-and-by-2026-it-will-be-even-tougher\/","is_active":false},{"id":93546,"title":"Theme 3: Risk is part of life. The Internet of Things will be accepted, despite dangers, because most people believe the worst-case scenario would never happen to them","slug":"theme-3-risk-is-part-of-life-the-internet-of-things-will-be-accepted-despite-dangers-because-most-people-believe-the-worst-case-scenario-would-never-happen-to-them","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/theme-3-risk-is-part-of-life-the-internet-of-things-will-be-accepted-despite-dangers-because-most-people-believe-the-worst-case-scenario-would-never-happen-to-them\/","is_active":false},{"id":93515,"title":"Theme 4: More people will be connected and more will withdraw or refuse to participate","slug":"theme-4-more-people-will-be-connected-and-more-will-withdraw-or-refuse-to-participate","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/theme-4-more-people-will-be-connected-and-more-will-withdraw-or-refuse-to-participate\/","is_active":false},{"id":93505,"title":"Theme 5: Human ingenuity and risk-mitigation strategies will make the Internet of Things safer","slug":"theme-5-human-ingenuity-and-risk-mitigation-strategies-will-make-the-internet-of-things-safer","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/theme-5-human-ingenuity-and-risk-mitigation-strategies-will-make-the-internet-of-things-safer\/","is_active":false},{"id":93530,"title":"Theme 6: Notable numbers will disconnect","slug":"theme-6-notable-numbers-will-disconnect","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/theme-6-notable-numbers-will-disconnect\/","is_active":false},{"id":93537,"title":"Theme 7: Whether or not people disconnect, the dangers are real. Security and civil liberties issues are being magnified by the rapid rise of the Internet of Things","slug":"theme-7-whether-or-not-people-disconnect-the-dangers-are-real-security-and-civil-liberties-issues-are-being-magnified-by-the-rapid-rise-of-the-internet-of-things","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/theme-7-whether-or-not-people-disconnect-the-dangers-are-real-security-and-civil-liberties-issues-are-being-magnified-by-the-rapid-rise-of-the-internet-of-things\/","is_active":true},{"id":93574,"title":"Acknowledgments","slug":"future-of-connectivity-acknowledgments","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/future-of-connectivity-acknowledgments\/","is_active":false}],"report_materials":[{"key":"74317745-1c47-4a56-b876-fc3a3524c678","type":"report","url":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2017\/06\/PI_2017.06.06_Future-of-Connectivity_FINAL.pdf","label":"","icon":"","attachmentId":""},{"key":"65ff293b-f8a2-4ea2-bac2-86399fc5da18","type":"promo","url":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/shareable-quotes-from-experts-on-the-future-of-the-internet-of-things-connectivity-binge\/","label":"Shareable quotes from experts on the future of the Internet of Things connectivity binge","icon":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/9\/2017\/03\/PI_2017.03.29_social-climate_quotes140x140.png?w=75&h=75&crop=1","attachmentId":18611}],"report_pagination":{"current_post":{"id":93537,"title":"Theme 7: Whether or not people disconnect, the dangers are real. Security and civil liberties issues are being magnified by the rapid rise of the Internet of Things","slug":"theme-7-whether-or-not-people-disconnect-the-dangers-are-real-security-and-civil-liberties-issues-are-being-magnified-by-the-rapid-rise-of-the-internet-of-things","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/theme-7-whether-or-not-people-disconnect-the-dangers-are-real-security-and-civil-liberties-issues-are-being-magnified-by-the-rapid-rise-of-the-internet-of-things\/","is_active":true,"page_num":9},"next_post":{"id":93574,"title":"Acknowledgments","slug":"future-of-connectivity-acknowledgments","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/future-of-connectivity-acknowledgments\/","is_active":false,"page_num":10},"previous_post":{"id":93530,"title":"Theme 6: Notable numbers will disconnect","slug":"theme-6-notable-numbers-will-disconnect","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/theme-6-notable-numbers-will-disconnect\/","is_active":false,"page_num":8},"pagination_items":[{"id":93494,"title":"The Internet of Things Connectivity Binge: What Are the Implications?","slug":"the-internet-of-things-connectivity-binge-what-are-the-implications","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/the-internet-of-things-connectivity-binge-what-are-the-implications\/","is_active":false,"page_num":1},{"id":93523,"title":"About this canvassing of experts","slug":"future-of-connectivity-about-this-canvassing-of-experts","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/future-of-connectivity-about-this-canvassing-of-experts\/","is_active":false,"page_num":2},{"id":93564,"title":"Theme 1: People crave connection and convenience, and a tech-linked world serves both goals well","slug":"theme-1-people-crave-connection-and-convenience-and-a-tech-linked-world-serves-both-goals-well","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/theme-1-people-crave-connection-and-convenience-and-a-tech-linked-world-serves-both-goals-well\/","is_active":false,"page_num":3},{"id":93555,"title":"Theme 2: Unplugging isn\u2019t easy now, and by 2026 it will be even tougher","slug":"theme-2-unplugging-isnt-easy-now-and-by-2026-it-will-be-even-tougher","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/theme-2-unplugging-isnt-easy-now-and-by-2026-it-will-be-even-tougher\/","is_active":false,"page_num":4},{"id":93546,"title":"Theme 3: Risk is part of life. The Internet of Things will be accepted, despite dangers, because most people believe the worst-case scenario would never happen to them","slug":"theme-3-risk-is-part-of-life-the-internet-of-things-will-be-accepted-despite-dangers-because-most-people-believe-the-worst-case-scenario-would-never-happen-to-them","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/theme-3-risk-is-part-of-life-the-internet-of-things-will-be-accepted-despite-dangers-because-most-people-believe-the-worst-case-scenario-would-never-happen-to-them\/","is_active":false,"page_num":5},{"id":93515,"title":"Theme 4: More people will be connected and more will withdraw or refuse to participate","slug":"theme-4-more-people-will-be-connected-and-more-will-withdraw-or-refuse-to-participate","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/theme-4-more-people-will-be-connected-and-more-will-withdraw-or-refuse-to-participate\/","is_active":false,"page_num":6},{"id":93505,"title":"Theme 5: Human ingenuity and risk-mitigation strategies will make the Internet of Things safer","slug":"theme-5-human-ingenuity-and-risk-mitigation-strategies-will-make-the-internet-of-things-safer","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/theme-5-human-ingenuity-and-risk-mitigation-strategies-will-make-the-internet-of-things-safer\/","is_active":false,"page_num":7},{"id":93530,"title":"Theme 6: Notable numbers will disconnect","slug":"theme-6-notable-numbers-will-disconnect","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/theme-6-notable-numbers-will-disconnect\/","is_active":false,"page_num":8},{"id":93537,"title":"Theme 7: Whether or not people disconnect, the dangers are real. Security and civil liberties issues are being magnified by the rapid rise of the Internet of Things","slug":"theme-7-whether-or-not-people-disconnect-the-dangers-are-real-security-and-civil-liberties-issues-are-being-magnified-by-the-rapid-rise-of-the-internet-of-things","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/theme-7-whether-or-not-people-disconnect-the-dangers-are-real-security-and-civil-liberties-issues-are-being-magnified-by-the-rapid-rise-of-the-internet-of-things\/","is_active":true,"page_num":9},{"id":93574,"title":"Acknowledgments","slug":"future-of-connectivity-acknowledgments","link":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/internet\/2017\/06\/06\/future-of-connectivity-acknowledgments\/","is_active":false,"page_num":10}]},"parent_info":{"parent_title":"The Internet of Things Connectivity Binge: What Are the Implications?","parent_id":93494},"materialsOrdered":[],"chaptersOrdered":[],"partsOrdered":[],"partsEnabled":false,"datacite_doi":"","prc_seo_data":{"title":"Security and civil liberties issues are being magnified by the rapid rise of the Internet of Things","description":"Many respondents to this canvassing said they are certain that there will be more attacks with more devastating results as billions more things and people become interconnected online and systems…","og_title":"Theme 7: Whether or not people disconnect, the dangers are real. Security and civil liberties issues are being magnified by the rapid rise of the Internet of Things","og_description":"","schema_type":"Article","noindex":false,"canonical_url":"","primary_terms":[],"custom_schema":[],"og_image":116459,"indexnow_submitted_at":null,"gsc_index_status":null},"prepublish_checks":{"prc-image-alt-text":{"status":"complete","message":"No image blocks in content.","data":null},"prc-about-this-research":{"status":"incomplete","message":"Add an \"About this research\" details block.","data":null},"prc-paragraph-count":{"status":"complete","message":"Found 42 paragraphs.","data":{"count":42}},"prc-internal-link":{"status":"incomplete","message":"Add at least one internal link.","data":{"count":0}}},"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"relatedPostsOrdered":[],"bylinesOrdered":[{"key":"02c5c8c0b9eddb1c766e4868108bc73f","termId":913},{"key":"af27afbcc83ed7ba71d44ceb535676a7","termId":840}],"acknowledgementsOrdered":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93537","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/117"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=93537"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93537\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":136123,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/93537\/revisions\/136123"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=93537"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=93537"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=93537"},{"taxonomy":"bylines","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/bylines?post=93537"},{"taxonomy":"collection","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/collection?post=93537"},{"taxonomy":"datasets","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/datasets?post=93537"},{"taxonomy":"level_of_effort","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/level_of_effort?post=93537"},{"taxonomy":"primary_audience","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/primary_audience?post=93537"},{"taxonomy":"information_type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/information_type?post=93537"},{"taxonomy":"_post_visibility","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/_post_visibility?post=93537"},{"taxonomy":"formats","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/formats?post=93537"},{"taxonomy":"_fund_pool","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/_fund_pool?post=93537"},{"taxonomy":"languages","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/languages?post=93537"},{"taxonomy":"regions-countries","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/regions-countries?post=93537"},{"taxonomy":"research-teams","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/research-teams?post=93537"},{"taxonomy":"workflow-status","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/beta.pewresearch.org\/pewresearch-org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/workflow-status?post=93537"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}